Griffith

(PC) Wardlaw v. Griffith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20201:19-cv-00848California901 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ROSS ALLEN WARDLAW, Case No. 1:19-cv-00848-AWI-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION v. BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM,

N. GRIFFITH, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT Defendants. ORDER 14 (ECF NOS. 1 & 13)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17 Ross Wardlaw (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on June 18, 2019. (ECF No. 1). On October 21, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it failed to state a claim. (ECF No. 13). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of the order to file an amended complaint or to notify the Court that he wants to stand on his complaint, subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.