(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20202:19-cv-00466California2,094 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-00466-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (ECF No. 29.) Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court is defendant Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7). (ECF No. 29). Plaintiff filed a response, and the court held a hearing on Wells Fargo’s motion on December 18, 2019. (ECF Nos. 35, 45.) For the following reasons, the court recommends granting defendant’s motion and dismissing plaintiff’s action against Wells Fargo. BACKGROUND Pro se plaintiff Prakash Narayan filed the present suit against Wells Fargo, Sacramento County, the City of Sacramento, and related entities. The complaint alleges improper property taxes and utility charges were assessed against plaintiff’s property and that Wells Fargo, the creditor for the property, created an illegal escrow account to pay these charges. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.