(PS) Sheetmetal & Assoc. v. Federal Express Corp.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20202:19-cv-02154California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES, No. 2:19-cv-2154-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which is currently set for hearing on January 8, 2020. ECF Nos. 6 & 8. Court records reflect plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, must be served upon the moving party, and filed with this court, no later than fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date or, in this instance, by December 26, 2019. Local Rule 183, governing persons appearing in pro se, provides that failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules may be grounds for dismissal, judgment by default, or other appropriate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.