Hubbard
(PC) Ruiz v. Hubbard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2: 19-cv-2351 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. HUBBARD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s complaint was filed with the court on November 20, 2019. The court’s own records reveal that on November 20, 2019, plaintiff filed a complaint containing virtually identical allegations. (2:19-cv-2350 JAM AC P.)1 Due to the duplicative nature of the present action, the court recommends that the complaint herein be dismissed.
22 1 A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).
The instant action and case 19-2350 allege that defendant A. Hubbard refused to file plaintiff’s complaint against Magistrate Judge Stormes. The allegations against defendant Hubbard in both 25 actions are identical. The…