(SS) Purcella v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20201:18-cv-01010California5,773 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERINA TERESA PURCELLA,

Case No. 1:18-cv-01010-SKO Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

SECURITY COMPLAINT

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security,1 Defendant. (Doc. 1) _____________________________________/ 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On July 26, 2018, Plaintiff Serina Teresa Purcella (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 20 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social 21 Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security 22 income (“SSI”). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were 23 submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate 24 Judge.2

On June 17, 2019, Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See 26 https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on September 12, 2019). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.