Sullivan

(HC) Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20201:19-cv-01161California536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR, Case No. 1:19-cv-01161-LJO-JDP

VEXATIOUS LITIGANT,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND Petitioner, RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS PETITION AT SCREENING v. ECF No.

J. W. SULLIVAN,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner Brandon Alexander Favor, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The court has referred this matter to a 19 magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 10, 2019, 20 the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that the court dismiss the 21 petition and decline to issue a certificate of appealability. ECF No. 9. On December 27, 2019, 22 petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 10. In his objections, 23 petitioner failed to address the deficiencies in his petition described in the findings and 24 recommendations. Id. Therefore, petitioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.