(SS) Madrigal v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20201:18-cv-01129California4,801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESMERALDA BERENISIA MADRIGAL,

Case No. 1:18-cv-01129-SKO 11 Plaintiff,

12 v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT

ANDREW SAUL,

Commissioner of Social Security,1 Defendant. (Doc. 1)

17 _____________________________________/

19 I. INTRODUCTION On August 21, 2018, Plaintiff Esmeralda Berenisia Madrigal (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under U.S.C. § 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral 26 On June 17, 2019, Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on September 12, 2019). He is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.