Koenig

(HC) Inman v. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20201:19-cv-01543California867 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD JERRELL INMAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01543-LJO-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, DENYING

v. PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR STAY,

DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF

C. KOENIG, HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK

OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE, AND

Respondent. DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

16 (ECF Nos. 10, 11) 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 15, 2019,1 the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that recommended dismissing the petition as an unauthorized successive petition and for failure to state a cognizable federal habeas claim. (ECF No. 10). In response to the Findings and Recommendation, Petitioner filed a request for a stay of the instant proceedings so that Petitioner “can obtain leave from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal due to this case being a successive petition.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.