Koenig
(HC) Inman v. Koenig
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20201:19-cv-01543California867 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RONALD JERRELL INMAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01543-LJO-EPG-HC
Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING
v. PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR STAY,
DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF
C. KOENIG, HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK
OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE, AND
Respondent. DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF
APPEALABILITY
16 (ECF Nos. 10, 11) 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 15, 2019,1 the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that recommended dismissing the petition as an unauthorized successive petition and for failure to state a cognizable federal habeas claim. (ECF No. 10). In response to the Findings and Recommendation, Petitioner filed a request for a stay of the instant proceedings so that Petitioner “can obtain leave from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal due to this case being a successive petition.”…