USCIS

(PS) Singh v. USCIS

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 20202:18-cv-02929California2,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VEER B SINGH, No. 2:18-cv-2929 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER USCIS, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES,

15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Veer Singh is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 17, 2019, the undersigned took under submission defendant’s motion to dismiss or for a more definitive statement. (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted and plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on November 7, 2018, by filing a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The complaint alleges that plaintiff previously “applied I-130 2 times” but defendant denied those applications. (Compl. //// ////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.