Tsaricati
(PS) Iegorova v. Tsaricati
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, No. 2:19-cv-0167 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LANA TSARICATI, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Liudmyla Iegorova is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed October 3, 2019, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the order was…