Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY LANGLEY, Case No.: 1:16-cv-01299-LJO-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND

v. DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY AWARD OF EXPENSES

E. GARCIA; G. COOK, SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

Defendants. (Docs. 39, 41)

16 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery responses. In his first motion, Plaintiff requests “production of original video/audio tapes/CDs/electronically stored evidence.” (Doc. 39.) The court construes this as a motion to compel under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. In his second motion, Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Defendants’ responses to requests for production.1 (Doc. 41.) Although Plaintiff attempts to bring this motion under Rule 26, (see id. at 1), the Court construes it as a motion brought under Rule 37. Defendants filed oppositions to the motions on August 5, 2019, and August 26, 2019. (Docs. 40, 42.) Plaintiff has not filed…