Thalia Ramos-Arredondo v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20201:19-cv-01130California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 THALIA RAMOS-ARREDONDO, CASE NO. 1:19-CV-1130 AWI BAM

Plaintiff ORDER CLOSING CASE IN LIGHT OF

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH

v. PREJUDICE

FCA US LLC and DOES 1-10 inclusive, (Doc. No. 11) Defendants

13 14 On January 2, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this case with prejudice, but with a request for the Court to retain jurisdiction. See Doc. No. 11. The stipulation cites Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), which deals with dismissals by court order. See id. However, because the stipulation is signed by all parties, the Court interprets the stipulation as governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Rule 41(a)(1), in relevant part, reads:

21 (A) . . . the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.