Grase

(PC) Davis v. Grase

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20201:18-cv-01668California232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 TERRENCE L. DAVIS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01668-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL J. GRASE, et al., (ECF No. 15) Defendants. 11 Plaintiff Terrence L. Davis is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice 14 of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)G@). CECF No. 15.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(), “a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his 16 action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted). No defendant in 18 this action has served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.