Verdin

Verdin v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20201:19-cv-01129California193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIANA VERDIN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-1129 - LJO JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE ) THE ACTION v. )

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., et al. ) (Doc. 11) ) Defendants. ) )

On January 2, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation indicating all parties agreed that the above- captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. (Doc. 11) Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” Because all parties who have appeared signed the stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2020 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.