(PS) Matthews v. Caliber Home Loans

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20202:19-cv-02463California1,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESMAL S. MATTHEWS, No. 2:19–cv–2463–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING OPPOSITION AND

RESETTING HEARING

v. (ECF No. 3) CALIBER HOME LOANS, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 9, 2019, Defendants removed this action from Sacramento Superior Court.1 (ECF No. 1.) Defendants then moved to dismiss, and set the matter for a hearing on January 16, 2020. (ECF No. 3.) Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rules, Plaintiff was obligated to file and serve a written opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing date: January 2, 2020. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or continued) hearing date. A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.