(PS) Korte v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20202:19-cv-02428California1,693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE KORTE, No. 2:19–cv–2428–TLN–KJN (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST AND STAYING CASE and v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

(ECF No. 1, 2) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, the undersigned grants the request to proceed in forma pauperis. However, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court is directed to dismiss the case at any time if it determines the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. For the reasons discussed below, the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.