Castro

Castro v. State of California

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 7, 20202:18-cv-02115California3,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY CASTRO, Individually and as No. 2:18-CV-02115-KJM-EFB Co-Successors in Interest, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 The parents and children of plaintiffs’ decedent Rodrick Roman Castro, as individuals and co-successors in interest, allege officers with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) at Deuel Vocational Institute failed to reasonably monitor and protect Rodrick from other inmates, resulting in his murder. The parent plaintiffs are Rodney Castro and Virginia Castro. The minor children are R.A.C, through guardian ad litem Irene Coronado; J.N.C., through guardian ad litem Erin Chavez; M.C., through guardian ad litem Claudia Silva; and D.R.M., through guardian ad litem Romie Martinez. Plaintiffs brought this action against the State of California, CDCR, Scott Kernan, Kimberly Seibel and CDCR Officer R. Adolfson for violations of various federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.