(PC) Madrid v. De La Cruz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20201:18-cv-00947California1,878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID JOSEPH MADRID, Case No. 1:18-cv-00947-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER OPENING DISCOVERY AND

SETTING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING

v. CONFERENCE

A. DE LA CRUZ and M. LOPEZ, (ECF No. 59)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MAIL A Defendants.

COPY OF THIS ORDER TO: SHERIFF OF

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 211 WEST

TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

16 17 David Madrid (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 23, 2019, the Court vacated the scheduling conference that was set in this case. (ECF No. 57). The Court also required Plaintiff “to file a notice stating whether he has enough funds in his prisoner trust account to pay for a phone call, and if so, whether he wants to use his funds in such a manner. The notice shall also include either an estimate regarding [] how long Plaintiff will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.