Pruitt

(PC) Malcolm Stroud v. Pruitt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20201:17-cv-01659California1,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALCOLM TANDY LAMON STROUD, Case No. 1:17-cv-01659-LJO-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

PRUITT, et al., PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND

Defendants. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO

CONSIDER PLAINTIFF’S SETTLEMENT

OFFER

17 (ECF No. 30)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff Malcolm Tandy Lamon Stroud is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. Introduction This action is currently proceeding on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Pruitt for sexual abuse in violation of the Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.