Diaz

(PC) Sahakyan v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20201:19-cv-00694California1,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN SAHAKYAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00694-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

RALPH DIAZ et al..,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

Defendants. DAYS

(ECF Nos. 1 & 10) 17 18 Plaintiff Karen Sahakyan (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant Complaint on May 20, 20 2019, along with a motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. (ECF Nos. 21 1 & 2.) Generally, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants are acting with deliberate indifference to 22 conditions posing a substantial risk of serious harm to Plaintiff by planning to merge Special 23 Needs Yard (“SNY”) (formerly known as a protective custody) inmates with General Population 24 (“GP”) inmates onto a yard known as a “Non-Designated Programming Facility”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.