Hicks

(PC) Ardds v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20201:19-cv-01738California1,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTOINE L. ARDDS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01738-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

D. HICKS, et.al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED ) ) [ECF No. 11] )

Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “motion in support of 42 USC 2000(d),” filed January 3, 2020. Plaintiff seeks a court order directing prison officials to refrain from denying access and/or destroying his legal property. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a request for a preliminary injunction. I. DISCUSSION The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.