Young
(PC) Tran v. Young
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BINH C. TRAN, No. 2:17-cv-1260 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER K. YOUNG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights when they failed to protect him, deprived him of due process during the disciplinary hearing process, and treated him differently than other inmates. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 50), defendants’ opposition (ECF No. 51), and plaintiff’s reply (ECF No. 56). For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motion to compel without prejudice. MOTION TO COMPEL I. Plaintiff’s Motion Plaintiff states he submitted requests for various documents, but defendants are withholding such evidence. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff additionally argues that defendants failed to comply with…