(PS) Samuelian v. CA Franchise Tax Board
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDRA C. SAMUELIAN, No. 2:19-cv-01333 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 7, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has made several irrelevant filings, which are neither an amended complaint nor objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF Nos. 14, 15, 16, 17. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s…