(PS) Mohamed v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20202:18-cv-02303California424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDO YAHRA MOHAMED, No. 2:18-cv-2303-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNITED STATES, Defendant. 16 Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint’s second cause of action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and noticed the motion for hearing on December 18, 2019. ECF No. 13. After plaintiff failed to timely respond to the motion, the hearing was continued and plaintiff was ordered, by no later than December 30, 2019, to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff was also ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition. Plaintiff was admonished that failure to file an opposition would be deemed a statement of non-opposition to the granting of defendant’s motion and could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.