Marroquin

(PC) Gao v. Marroquin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20201:19-cv-00438California2,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON GAO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00438-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION D. MARROQUIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 11, 12) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Jason Gao is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 9, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment against Defendant Marroquin, but failed to state any other cognizable claims against any other defendants. (ECF No. 11.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either file a second amended complaint or notify the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.