Purnell

Purnell v. Mora

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20201:19-cv-00210California4,208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGETTE G. PURNELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00210-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT R.T. MORA, et al., (Doc. No. 1) Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 12 Plaintiff Georgette G. Purnell (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action against Fresno County Police Officers R.T. Mora, Hodge, N. Cruz, and B. Phelps (“Defendants”), alleging violation of her civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 1, 5-6.) Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by litigants proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.