Stainer
(PC) Callins v. Stainer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 CARLTON R. CALLINS, Case No. 1:17-cv-00840-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-
v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
C. PFEIFFER, et al.,
15 Defendants. 16 Carlton Callins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 22, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 51). The Court gave Plaintiff until December 20, 2019, to file an opposition. (ECF No. 48, p. 2). The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the motion has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition. Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of…