Mayfield

(PC) Muied v. Mayfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20201:19-cv-00982California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 JABARI HALEEM MUIED, Case No. 1:19-cv-0982-LJO-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO v. AMEND AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A RESPONSE

B. MAYFIELD,

(Doc. 12) 15 Defendant.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff moves for leave to amend his complaint. Because plaintiff may amend his complaint once as a matter of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), this motion will be denied as moot. However, it is not clear whether the document that plaintiff filed with his motion is itself the amended complaint. Instead, it appears that plaintiff is referencing allegations from the original complaint and including additional commentary related to exhibits attached to the instant motion. But nowhere in this second document does plaintiff provide the factual basis of his claims. Insofar as plaintiff is asking the Court to peruse the exhibits in order to determine the factual basis of his claim,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.