Arellano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIK ARELLANO, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-1235- JLT ) Plaintiff, ) RAND NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF ) v. ) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE ANY CHAD HASKINS, et al., ) OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 14, Defendants. ) 2020 ) )

TO PLAINTIFF ERIK ARELLANO, PRO SE: Plaintiff is advised1, pursuant to Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988) and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), of the following requirements for opposing the motion for summary judgment made by defendants pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: 1. Such a motion is a request for an order for judgment on some or all of Plaintiff’s claims in favor of Defendants without trial. See Rule 56(b). 2. Defendants’ motion set forth the facts which they contend are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle them to judgment…