Moser

(PC) Harris v. Moser

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20201:19-cv-01117California584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN HARRIS, No. 1:19-cv-01117-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

R. MOSER., et al., MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 3, 5)

17 Plaintiff Marvin Harris (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on August 15, 2019. (Doc. No. 1.) On August 19, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff “not be allowed proceed in forma pauperis in this action,” and that he “be directed to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full if he wants to proceed with this action.” (Doc. No. 3.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.