Pfeiffer

(HC) Ramirez v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20202:17-cv-00619California705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD RAMIREZ, No. 2:17-cv-00619-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Richard Ramirez (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 12, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 21.) On September 25, 2019, Petitioner filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 24.) On November 5, 2019, Respondent Christian Pfeiffer (“Respondent”) filed a Reply to Petitioner’s Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 27.) 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.