Warren

(PC) Corral v. Warren

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20202:18-cv-00024California1,555 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL, No. 2:18-cv-0024 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND WARREN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 8, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found that plaintiff could proceed on two claims arising under the First Amendment. The remaining defendants, Berlier, Bouldin, Woodman and Melgarejo, have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). When considering whether a complaint states a claim upon which relief can be granted, the court must accept the allegations as true, Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-94 (2007), and construe the complaint in the light most favorable to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.