Anderson

(PC) Garbett v. Anderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20202:18-cv-01793California258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARRICK M. GARBETT, No. 2:18-CV-1793-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JENNIFER SCHAFFER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the court's final judgment entered on September 30, 2019. The matter was referred to the undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to certify whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith, in which case in forma pauperis status would be revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Having reviewed the entire file, the court concludes in forma pauperis status should be revoked because the appeal is frivolous. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status should be revoked; and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.