(PC) Mays v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20202:18-cv-02081California406 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORENZO MAYS, RICKY No. 2:18-cv-02081-TLN-KJN

RICHARDSON, JENNIFER BOTHUN,

ARMANI LEE, LEERTESE BEIRGE, and [CLASS ACTION] CODY GARLAND, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs,

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND

v. EXPENSES

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 18 Plaintiffs Lorenzo Mays, Ricky Richardson, Jennifer Bothun, Armani Lee, Leertese Beirge, and Cody Garland (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are state prisoners, proceeding through counsel. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 9, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. (ECF No. 105.) On December 19, 2019, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.