Oddo

(HC) Hanrahan v. Oddo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20202:19-cv-00641California277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HANRAHAN, No. 2:19-cv-0641 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS L.J. ODDO, Respondent. 16 By order filed December 12, 2019, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why this action should not be dismissed as moot. The fourteen-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.