Brown

(PC) Lopez v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20201:17-cv-00343California753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM R. LOPEZ, No. 1:17-cv-00343-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

DR. BROWN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

Defendants. DISMISSING THIS CASE, WITH

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM (Doc. Nos. 21, 22) 18 19 Plaintiff Adam R. Lopez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 5, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel be denied and this case be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under §1983. (Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.