Moore

(PC) Van Gessel v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20201:18-cv-01478California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER ALLEN VAN GESSEL, No. 1:18-cv-01478-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

DR. THOMAS MOORE, et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Defendants. (Doc. No. 13)

17 Plaintiff Christopher Allen Van Gessel is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action brought pursuant to the decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 29, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Doc. No. 9) be denied. (Doc. No. 13.) Specifically, the magistrate judge found that the court lacks jurisdiction to issue the order sought by plaintiff. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.