Acebedo
(PC) Castaneda v. Acebedo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS BONILLA CASTANEDA, Case No.: 1:16-cv-01562-LJO-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST
SHERMAN, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
Defendants. (Doc. 56)
21-DAY DEADLINE
17 Defendants move for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 56.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion on November 6, 2019, and Defendants filed a reply. (Docs. 60-62.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that Defendants’ motion be granted in part and denied in part and that Hacker and Sherman be dismissed as defendants. I. SUMMARY OF FACTS A. Plaintiff’s Factual Allegations Plaintiff’s claims stem from events that occurred while he was incarcerated at Substance 26 …