Acebedo

(PC) Castaneda v. Acebedo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20201:16-cv-01562California4,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS BONILLA CASTANEDA, Case No.: 1:16-cv-01562-LJO-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

SHERMAN, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendants. (Doc. 56)

21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Defendants move for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 56.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion on November 6, 2019, and Defendants filed a reply. (Docs. 60-62.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that Defendants’ motion be granted in part and denied in part and that Hacker and Sherman be dismissed as defendants. I. SUMMARY OF FACTS A. Plaintiff’s Factual Allegations Plaintiff’s claims stem from events that occurred while he was incarcerated at Substance 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.