Kernan

(PC) Anderson v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20201:19-cv-00255California3,166 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR ANDERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-0255-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO ADD A DEFENDANT AND

v. MOTION TO STAND ON COMPLAINT;

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Defendants. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

RESPONSE

(Docs. 1, 20, 21)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff has filed complaint asserting constitutional claims against governmental employees and/or entities.1 (Doc. 1.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought by inmates seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be 25 1 After…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.