Foster

Foster v. Division of Adult Parole Operations

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20201:19-cv-00987California1,429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLOYD FOSTER, JR., 1:19-CV-00987-LJO-SAB

7 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DECLINING TO ADOPT v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE

OPERATIONS, et al., (ECF NO. 14)

Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Floyd Foster, a California state inmate, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 14 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). 15 While awaiting disposition of state law charges of driving under the influence of alcohol 16 (“DUI”), Plaintiff attempted to post bail in the matter. ECF No. 13 at 5-6.1 Plaintiff alleges his attempts 17 to secure his release came after the court granted the state’s request to withdraw a related parole 18 violation and ordered on October 27, 2017, that Plaintiff be released on the withdrawn violation. Id. 19 Plaintiff contends that he was unable to post bail in the DUI matter because the state parole agent 20 present in court for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.