Bonilla-Chirinos

Bonilla-Chirinos v. City of West Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 20202:15-cv-02564California977 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

GUILLERMO BONILLA-CHIRINOS No. 2:15-cv-2564 WBS EFB and SANDRA HERNANDEZ, individually and as guardians ad litem of J.B., a minor, 14 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MINOR’S COMPROMISE v. 16 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO and police officers KENNETH

FELLOWS, MICHELLE TATE,

ANTHONY HERRERA, THOMAS

MAGGIANO, JENNIFER GRILLAT,

ERIC ANGLE, MATTHEW LUIZ, and DAVID STALLIONS, in their individual and official capacities, 21 Defendants. 22 23 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiffs Guillermo Bonilla-Chirinos and Sandra Hernandez, individually and on behalf of their son J.B., brought this action against defendants the City of West Sacramento (“the City”) and several West Sacramento police officers alleging, among other things, that defendants used excessive force in arresting them and violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to familial association. After the court granted summary judgment in whole or in part as to several claims and defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.