Wong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR GLENN JONES, SR., No. 2:15-cv-0734 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SAM WONG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion for reconsideration directed to the undersigned. ECF No. 115. By order filed December 4, 2019, the undersigned denied plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a sur-reply to defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Local Rule 230(l) did not provide for a sur-reply and plaintiff had not provided an explanation as to why he should be allowed to file one. ECF No. 114. Plaintiff now seeks reconsideration of that order, and leave to file a sur-reply, on the ground that defendants have misstated the facts by claiming the medical records he submitted are not authenticated and are therefore unreliable. ECF No. 115 at 4. He argues that if he is not allowed to file a sur-reply…