(PS) Meyers v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20202:16-cv-01121California1,136 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLEN MEYERS, No. 2:16-cv-01121-MCE-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Presently set for hearing on January 22, 2020 is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 42, 49.) On January 8, 2020, plaintiff filed a document styled as a response to the motion for summary judgment, a request to continue his opposition to the motion, a request to stay proceedings, and a request to reopen discovery. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff attempted to set a hearing on January 25, 2020, which the court notes at the outset is improper under the Local Rules. (Id.; see also Local Rule 230(b) (stating that a “matter shall be set for hearing . . . not less than twenty-eight (28) days after service and filing of the motion”).) II. Relevant Procedural History On May 24, 2016, District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. issued a scheduling order that set the close of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.