Marcum
Marcum v. Corey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JACQLYN A. MARCUM, No. 2:19-cv-01135-KJM-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOSEPH COREY, et al., Defendants. 15 On October 18, 2019, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within fourteen days why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute as to remaining defendants Joseph Corey, Citibank and Salvador Ramirez. ECF No. 9. As of this order, plaintiff has failed to comply with the court’s show cause order and defendants Corey, Citibank and Ramirez have not been served or appeared in this action. Under Local Rule 110, where counsel or a party fail to comply with a court order, the court is authorized to impose “any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” E.D. Cal. R. 110. “It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution.” Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (citing Link v. Wabash R.…