Arellano

Arellano v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20201:17-cv-01235California3,842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIK ARELLANO, ) Case No.: 1:17-cv-01235 - LJO-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ ) MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY v. ) ) (Doc. 42) CHAD HASKINS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

Erik Arellano asserts Bakersfield Police Officers Chad Haskins and Frederick Martinez used excessive force after he surrendered to an arrest. (Doc. 9) Defendants assert Plaintiff again failed to provide proper responses to their interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. Pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants seek to compel Plaintiff to provide further discovery responses. (Doc. 42) Plaintiff opposes the motion, asserting he complied with the prior motion to compel and provided verified responses to his discovery responses. (Doc. 43) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion to compel further discovery from Plaintiff is GRANTED in part. I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.