Harper
Harper v. City of Merced
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20201:18-cv-00562California5,920 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARCY HARPER, 1:18-cv-00562 LJO SKO
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION
COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., (ECF NOS. 38 & 39) Defendants.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case concerns the alleged use of excessive force against and failure to reasonably
accommodate Plaintiff Darcy Harper (“Plaintiff”) on June 6, 2014 during the course of his arrest.
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in April 2018 against the arresting officer,
Merced Police Officer Nathaniel McKinnon (“Officer McKinnon”), the City of Merced (the “City”), and
the County of Merced (the “County”). The Court, on November 8, 2018, granted Defendants’ motion to
dismiss all claims against the County and the Monell claim against the City. ECF No. 22. Even though