(SS) Caglia v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20201:19-cv-01376California1,898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CAGLIA, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-1376 JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING THE SECOND ) AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO v. ) AMEND

ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security , ) ) Defendant. )

Anthony Caglia seeks judicial review of the administrative decision denying an application for Social Security benefits. Because it is unclear whether the request for judicial review is timely and the Court has jurisdiction over this action, the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. I. Screening Requirement When an individual is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court is required to review the complaint, and shall dismiss the case at any time if the Court determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or the action or appeal is “frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or . . . seeks monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.