(PC)Washington
(PC)Washington v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 WILLIAM NATHANIEL Case No. 1:19-cv-01556-AWI-JLT (PC)
WASHINGTON,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO PROCEED v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DISMISSING
ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND (Docs. 2, 6, 7) REHABILITATION, et al.,
10 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff William Nathaniel Washington is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 7, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 2), because Plaintiff has three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g) and fails to show that he is in 19 imminent danger of serious physical injury.1 (Doc. 6.) In…