(PC) Hearns v. Gonzales
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20201:17-cv-00038California5,535 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMAR R. HEARNS, 1:17-cv-00038-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT
vs. GONZALES’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BE DENIED
ROSA GONZALES, et al., (ECF No. 40.)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
18
20 I. BACKGROUND Jamar Hearns (“Plaintiff”) is a former prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with the First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on February 9, 2018, against defendant Rosa Gonzales (“Defendant”) on Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation, violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, and violation of the Bane Act. (ECF No. 17.) 27 1 On April 16, 2018, the court issued an order dismissing all other claims and defendants from this action. (ECF No. 21.) On May 3, 2019, Defendant filed a motion…