Walker
Walker v. Police Chief
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 Case No. 1:19-cv-01546-LJO-SKO
HAROLD WALKER,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE Plaintiff, ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S v. ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM
POLICE CHIEF JOHN DOE, et al., (Doc. 5) Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
13 On October 31, 2019, Plaintiff Harold Walker, proceeding pro se, filed a civil complaint against eight officers of the Fresno Police Department and three employees of Grocery Outlet. (Doc. 1 (“Compl.”).) Plaintiff purports to allege causes of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) for “making false statement[s] to police,” false arrest, “false prosecution,” excessive force, and municipal liability in violation of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and rights under the California Constitution. (Id. at 5–7.) Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages in…